000193744 001__ 193744
000193744 003__ CZ-ZdVUG
000193744 005__ 20191128093921.0
000193744 041__ $$aeng
000193744 040__ $$aABC039$$bcze
000193744 1001_ $$aFiller, Vratislav
000193744 24510 $$aCause of scale inconsistencies in DORIS time series
000193744 300__ $$a14 stran
000193744 5203_ $$9eng$$aIn this paper we analyze the scale of the DORIS (Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite) solutions with respect to DORIS extension of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) for Precise Orbit Determination DPOD2014. The main goal is to explain the scale inconsistencies and to find the optimal solution reaching low-biased and consistent scale time series. Our analysis profits from 4 different strategies based only on the Geodetic Observatory Pecný analysis center solution, using DORIS exchange format data 2.2. A difference in the sequence of the solutions directly corresponds to one of the changes in the solution settings: data elevation dependent weighting, application of data validity indicators and application of phase center - reference point correction. We process multi-satellite and single-satellite solutions for the time period 2011.02017.0. Our analysis examines scale inconsistency issues in 2011/2012 and in 2015. The scale increment in 2011/2012 is explained as a result of the concurrence of changes in satellite constellation and change in the provider data validity standards for Cryosat-2 and Jason-2 satellites. The scale increment in 2015 is explained as the effect of change in the standards for phase center - reference center corrections for Saral, Jason-2 and ryosat-2 satellites. Moreover, comparing the solutions with and without elevation dependent data downweighting using the same elevation cutoff (10), we found a significant reduction of scale bias and scale variation applying the data downweighting. The data downweighting improved also the station positioning repeatability. We demonstrate that the solution, which is completely free from the additional data associated with observations in DORIS exchange format 2.2 and includes the data downweighting law, eventuates in a consistent scale time series with the lowest offset with respect to DPOD2014 (version 1.0) (12.7 ± 2.3 mm for 2011.0-2017.0). The only remaining scale issue is the part of 2011/2012 increment of around 5 mm, explained by a change in the DORIS satellite constellation.
000193744 655_4 $$ačlánek v odborném časopise
000193744 7001_ $$aŠtěpánek, Petr
000193744 7730_ $$92018$$dSpolková republika Německo,2018.$$g62. (4), s.562–585$$tStudia Geophysica et Geodaetica$$x0039-3169
000193744 85642 $$ahttps://www.rvvi.cz/riv?s=rozsirene-vyhledavani&ss=detail&n=0&h=RIV%2F00025615%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000049%21RIV19-MSM-00025615
000193744 85642 $$uhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-018-0406-x
000193744 910__ $$aABC039
000193744 980__ $$aclanky_vugtk
000193744 985__ $$ariv
000193744 985__ $$autvar24
000193744 985__ $$afiller
000193744 985__ $$astepanek